The images 
in the following program 
are very sensitive 
and may be 
as disturbing to viewers 
as they were to us. 
However, 
we have to show the truth 
about cruelty to animals, 
praying that 
you will help to stop it.
This is the 
Stop Animal Cruelty series 
on Supreme Master 
Television 
where this week 
we examine the heartless 
and unconscionable practice 
of hunting wildlife.
The US-based 
non-profit organization, 
In Defense of Animals’ 
(IDA’s) stated mission is 
“to end animal exploitation, 
cruelty, and abuse 
by protecting and 
advocating for the rights, 
welfare, and habitats 
of animals, as well as 
to raise their status 
beyond mere property, 
commodities, or things.”
Since 1983 
this group has been a leader 
in animal protection, 
including in the area 
of halting the murder 
of wildlife. 
Over the years 
In Defense of Animals 
has stopped bow hunting 
of the Tule Elk 
and killing of peacocks 
at Point Reyes 
National Seashore, a park 
in California, USA, 
halted a planned 
aerial killing of wolves 
in Alaska, USA, 
prevented a buffalo hunt 
from going forward 
in New Mexico, USA, 
caused the cancellation 
of a hunting competition 
that would have meant 
the deaths of up to 1,000 
bobcats, coyotes, 
cougars, and foxes 
in a single weekend 
in Arizona, USA, 
and successfully halted 
a bear hunt 
in New Jersey, USA. 
Today’s program features 
excerpts from an episode 
of the In Defense 
of Animals-produced 
television series 
“Undercover TV” 
entitled “What’s Wrong 
With Hunting?”  
Undercover TV is hosted 
by Mr. Kenneth G. Williams, 
a vegan 
professional body builder 
from the United States 
and a spokesperson for 
In Defense of Animals’s 
veganism campaign.
This superb athlete 
made sports history 
in 2004, 
when he won third place 
at the prestigious 
Natural Olympia 
bodybuilding competition 
in Las Vegas, USA and
became the first vegan 
bodybuilding champion 
in the United States. 
Let us now watch 
selected segments from 
“What’s Wrong 
With Hunting?”
Welcome to 
Undercover TV. 
Today we have a special 
presentation of the video, 
“What’s Wrong 
With Hunting?” 
This video exposes 
the animal cruelty that 
occurs during hunting. 
Some of the images 
are graphic 
and viewer discretion 
is advised. 
Hi, I’m Marv Levy. 
I’ve often been asked 
if hunting is a sport 
since I engage in 
what I consider 
to be a sport also. 
During the course 
of this video, I’d like 
to address that subject. 
What’s Wrong 
With Hunting?
Hey angel, consider… 
It is not right to go out 
and kill an animal 
purely for the sport of it. 
These animals swim. 
They play. They breathe. 
They have young, they love. 
How can you kill that? 
How can you kill it? 
So why don’t you go hiking? 
Why don’t you go camping? 
Why don’t you go out and 
have fun and track animals 
but not kill them, 
not take the gun? 
You believe in 
the ten commandments
right?
One of those is 
“Thou shall not kill.”
And all the hunters said 
that they enjoy nature 
and they enjoy wildlife. 
Well, 
how are we supposed to 
enjoy nature and wildlife 
in the future 
if we kill it all? 
Well, what makes a sport 
is one, first and foremost, 
the sides are even. 
You’re playing 
on a level playing field. 
The people 
participating in it 
want to do it, both sides 
of the line of scrimmage.
Well, I’ve often heard 
people saying, “You know, 
football’s a violent game 
so how is that different 
from hunting?” 
Well, it’s different 
in any number of ways. 
First of all, 
as I said before, 
the participants 
want to be in it. 
They’re conditioned for it 
and it’s a game. 
And when it’s over, if 
you’re in good condition, 
your chances of 
walking off in good shape 
are excellent and 
you play again another day. 
Only the hunter has 
the chance of walking off 
the hunting field healthy. 
The animal is dead forever. 
I think a sport is 
two teams competing for 
the same thing – to win 
and to be number one. 
And that’s what everybody 
in professional sports 
is striving to be - the best 
and to be number one. 
As far as hunting, 
to kill an animal, 
how can you consider 
that being number one 
when you killed something? 
I don’t consider 
hunting a sport, 
I consider it murder. 
I think people see change. 
Other people 
don’t want to see it and 
they see that as being 
a part of their heritage. 
People like me are insisting 
that they stop. 
And they say, 
“Well, all animals 
eat other animals. 
That’s natural, 
that’s a way of life. 
So why shouldn’t we?” 
And I answer 
with a simple statement, 
“We’re the only animal 
that has a choice.” 
Hunters represent only 
six percent of Americans, 
yet they control almost 
100% of our wildlife. 
And a lot of people 
support hunting because 
they’ve been conditioned 
to hear the hunter’s myths, 
of “Oh, we’ve got to hunt 
or the deer are going to 
starve and overpopulate.” 
And you know, 
“We have to hunt to survive 
and it’s a tradition.” 
But as people start 
to explore those issues, 
you’re going 
to have more people in 
the camp of compassion 
than thinking, bringing 
a violent end to an animal 
as something positive. 
The problem is 
the average person hears 
the sound bite 
from the hunter, 
“Deer are overpopulated 
and are going to starve 
to death if we don’t go out 
and kill them.” 
And in reality, 
the explanations 
that wildlife biologists 
need to give, 
the responsible ones, 
take a lot more time than 
appear in a sound bite 
on the ten o’clock news. 
Sometimes what people 
mean when they say 
“overpopulation” is that 
there are too many animals 
on a given piece of land. 
But most often 
what they mean 
by overpopulation 
is they don’t like the impact 
a particular animal 
is having on their land, 
their home, their property. 
Hunting leads to 
overpopulation and 
it sounds counter-intuitive, 
but the way it works is 
when you hunt a population, 
what you do, you end up 
reducing it temporarily. 
And all wildlife 
populations have 
a reproduction response 
based on the available 
food resources. 
So when they have 
more food, they tend 
to have more offspring, 
and they breed 
at an earlier age. 
When they have less food, 
they tend to not breed 
so quickly, they tend 
to have less offspring 
and sometimes they 
even re-absorb fetuses 
when times are very hard. 
So what happens 
after hunting seasons, 
suddenly the remaining 
animals have more food, 
they tend 
to have more offspring 
the following spring 
and suddenly 
the population rebounds 
and you’ve actually 
triggered growth 
in the populations 
because of hunting. 
Say you have 
a population of 10 deer, 
and normally you’d have 
five females and five males 
in this population, 
a very simplistic model. 
So say it was a good year, 
the highest number of 
fawns that could be born 
in that population of ten, 
if there were five females, 
would be 10 offspring, 
which would be assuming 
that every one 
of those females 
was breeding age 
and had twins. 
But say then you turned 
to a hunted population, 
again you have 
a population of 10. 
But in that population, 
so many males 
have been taken out that 
you have nine females 
for every male. 
So in that population, 
that one male can mate 
with all nine females 
and have as much as 
eighteen fawns, 
which is a lot more 
than in the normal 
un-hunted population. 
The idea 
that if we don’t hunt them 
they’re going to starve, 
is based on 
some faulty assumptions, 
because first of all, 
we don’t even know 
how many deer might 
starve in a given winter. 
We don’t know that 
the ones we’re taking out 
are necessarily the ones 
that would have starved. 
And again 
I think it’s always best to 
let nature take its course. 
The ones that will starve 
will be the ones 
that are less fit 
to get through the winter. 
And the one’s that remain 
are going to be the ones 
that are better fit 
and should be 
passing on their genes. 
It’s hypocritical 
for state wildlife agencies 
to use the deer-vehicle 
collision argument 
to support hunting 
because the agency, 
their entire goal is to 
literally grow more wildlife 
for hunters to shoot. 
They use various techniques 
to do that. 
They’ll manipulate 
the sex ratio of the species 
in question, most cases 
white-tailed deer. 
They will modify the habitat 
to increase productivity 
in the deer population. 
So there are 
more deer out there 
and they’re reproducing 
more and more each year. 
So there’s more animals 
for the hunters to shoot. 
To do that on one hand, 
but then to come out 
and say, “We need 
to shoot these deer 
because there’s too many 
that are hitting cars, or 
cars are hitting too many,” 
is extremely hypocritical 
because they’re 
creating the situation. 
The bison is 
a perfect example 
of a species that we 
nearly hunted to extinction. 
These animals 
were plentiful 
across North America 
until the US government 
decided to have 
an all-out war 
against the bison. 
And they are very few 
in number today; 
most of them 
who still survive 
are in Yellowstone 
National Park, where 
they are safe from hunting. 
But unfortunately 
if they leave that park 
and walk into the state of 
Montana (USA) 
or Wyoming (USA), 
they’re gunned down. 
You know 
it’s just a perfect example 
of an animal that is killed 
for no other reason 
than a trophy. 
Someone wants to 
take home their head and 
hang it over a fireplace. 
These are mallard ducks 
and there are some geese 
behind us as well. 
And these and many 
other types of waterfowl 
are hunted very frequently. 
There are about 
six million ducks 
that are killed every year 
in the US by hunters. 
We’ve got foxes here 
in this pen, and luckily 
for these foxes 
they’re safe here 
at the Fund 
for Animals Sanctuary. 
But in the wild, foxes are 
one of the few species 
that are both hunted 
and trapped. 
They’re allowed 
to be killed both with guns 
or with steel-jaw 
leghold traps or snares 
or other types of traps. 
In some states, there are
no bag limits and 
no season dates on foxes. 
They’re allowed 
to kill them year round 
with absolutely 
no regulations. 
Hunting is barbaric 
and wrong. 
The animals 
that are preyed upon 
by the hunters 
are gentle and 
want nothing but peace 
for themselves 
and their families. 
Let humanity 
now turn a new page and 
halt hunting permanently. 
Let us also embrace 
the loving, caring 
and nourishing 
organic vegan lifestyle 
as it is the best way 
to ensure 
a harmonious world 
where all beings are equal.
Many thanks 
In Defense of Animals 
as well as Kenneth Williams 
and all others 
appearing in this video 
for sincerely seeking an end 
to the senseless slaughter 
of our innocent 
animal co-inhabitants. 
Through our life-affirming 
collective efforts, 
may all beings soon live 
in peace and harmony 
on our shared Earth. 
For more details on 
In Defense of Animals, 
please visit 
www.IDAUSA.org 
A DVD of 
Undercover TV episodes 
is available 
at the same website
Thank you 
for your company 
on today’s program. 
Please join us 
next Tuesday 
on Stop Animal Cruelty 
for further excerpts from 
“What’s Wrong 
With Hunting?” 
Coming up next is 
Enlightening Entertainment, 
following 
Noteworthy News. 
May every animal always 
be treated with respect 
and cherished 
as a family member.
The images 
in the following program 
are highly sensitive 
and may be 
as disturbing to viewers 
as they were to us. 
However, 
we have to show the truth 
about cruelty to animals, 
praying that 
you will help to stop it.
This is the 
Stop Animal Cruelty series 
on Supreme Master 
Television. 
This week is 
the second and final part 
of two-part program 
on the appalling practice 
of hunting wildlife.
The US-based 
non-profit organization, 
In Defense of Animals’ 
(IDA’s) stated mission is 
“to end animal exploitation, 
cruelty, and abuse 
by protecting and 
advocating for the rights, 
welfare, and habitats 
of animals, as well as 
to raise their status 
beyond mere property, 
commodities, or things.”
Since 1983 
this group has been a leader 
in animal protection, 
including in the area 
of halting the murder 
of wildlife. 
Over the years 
In Defense of Animals 
has stopped bow hunting 
of the Tule Elk 
and killing of peacocks 
at Point Reyes 
National Seashore, a park 
in California, USA, 
halted a planned 
aerial killing of wolves 
in Alaska, USA, 
prevented a buffalo hunt 
from going forward 
in New Mexico, USA, 
caused the cancellation 
of a hunting competition 
that would have meant 
the deaths of up to 1,000 
bobcats, coyotes, 
cougars, and foxes 
in a single weekend 
in Arizona, USA, 
and successfully halted 
a bear hunt 
in New Jersey, USA. 
Today’s program features 
further excerpts
from an episode 
of the In Defense 
of Animals-produced 
television series 
“Undercover TV” 
entitled “What’s Wrong 
With Hunting?”  
Undercover TV is hosted 
by Mr. Kenneth G. Williams, 
a vegan 
professional body builder 
from the United States 
and a spokesperson for 
In Defense of Animals’ 
veganism campaign.
This superb athlete 
made sports history 
in 2004, 
when he won third place 
at the prestigious 
Natural Olympia 
bodybuilding competition 
in Las Vegas, USA and
became the first vegan 
bodybuilding champion 
in the United States. 
Welcome to 
Undercover TV. 
Today we have a special 
presentation of the video, 
“What’s Wrong 
With Hunting?” 
This video exposes 
the animal cruelty that 
occurs during hunting. 
Some of the images 
are graphic 
and viewer discretion 
is advised. 
If you look at the way 
that hunting language 
is used, even that is 
brainwashing because 
when you have a hunter 
talking about 
culling, harvesting, 
what they’re really doing 
is they’re killing 
a living being. 
They’re not 
harvesting a crop. 
But if you use 
that type of language, 
that’s going to then 
take away that animal’s 
personality in your mind. 
And so it’s to their 
advantage to make us 
think of animals as things. 
Animals aren’t things. 
If you look at 
pain receptors, which 
are called “nociceptors”
 from Latin, 
in any animal, 
a non-human animal as 
well as a human animal, 
anatomically 
and physiologically 
they’re identical – 
same chemistry, 
same wave transmission, 
same sending impulses 
up the leg or up the arm. 
So if the receptors 
are the same and 
the chemistry is the same, 
we can assume 
that pretty much the same 
impact is perceived. 
The other thing is logically, 
think what pain 
is telling you. 
Again, 
pain is to be interpreted 
as such an overriding 
negative stimulus that 
you respond to the pain 
before you have time 
to think about it. 
If it were not 
that negative a stimulus, 
then the species 
wouldn’t survive. 
I really don’t think 
that our pain is 
any more significant to us 
than the animal’s pain 
is to that animal. 
We may be dealing 
with a different frame 
of reference, 
my philosophical or 
experiential background 
may be different than 
a beaver’s and marten’s, 
but still the pain and terror 
that I might feel 
because of a serious injury 
or a terrifying experience 
are the worst 
and biggest things 
in my consciousness. 
Similarly, 
the pain and terror 
for that beaver and marten 
is the worst 
in their experience 
of their consciousness. 
The very first operation 
that I ever remember, 
we had a red-tailed hawk 
brought in to us, 
and it had been shot. 
Now there’s no way 
you can shoot 
a red-tailed hawk legally. 
It’s a protected species, 
it’s a migratory species, 
protected under 
international law, 
protected under 
federal law,
protected under state law, 
there are incredible fines 
associated with (hurting) it. 
This one had been 
brought in and 
it had a shattered elbow. 
And so we put it down 
on the table and 
the kids gathered around 
because that’s how we do it; 
we do it 
right in the classroom 
and we had 
the operating table there. 
They began to assist me 
and I was assisting them. 
And a little red haired girl, 
her name was 
Jenny Lynch, 
she was assisting me 
on the left side. 
She was holding 
some sutures. 
And as we got into that, 
trying to repair 
that shattered elbow, 
Jenny looked up at me 
and she said, 
“How could anybody 
try and kill something 
that beautiful?” 
Well, 
I was a very intelligent, 
very gifted science teacher; 
and very gifted, 
intelligent science teachers 
know everything. 
So I looked down at her, 
at Jenny, and I said, 
“Jenny, that’s just the way 
the world is.” 
What bothered me 
was the answer 
that I gave Jenny, 
“That’s just the way 
the world is,” which
I look back at that now
was an indictment 
of the world, 
that’s not the way 
the world is.
We are better than that. 
We are better than 
creatures that simply 
go out in the woods, 
armed with a gun, 
and shoot something 
from ambush 
just for pleasure. 
That is not 
how I see humanity, 
not how I see 
the human race. 
Hunters hide and shoot 
from ambush. 
In the old West, 
they had a name 
for people who shot 
from the ambush, 
they called them 
“bushwhackers.” 
And there was 
no lower form of life 
in the West 
than a bushwhacker. 
Hunting is bushwhacking. 
If someone I loved 
wanted to go hunting, 
the first thing I’d do 
is ask them why? 
Why are they 
going hunting? 
And the people 
who go sport hunting, 
they do it for the fun of it. 
And I guess because 
they think it’s macho 
and they have something 
to prove. 
Anybody who thinks that 
they’re more of a man 
because they carry a gun 
and shoot some animal 
that doesn’t even know 
they’re there, sorry it just 
doesn’t wash with me. 
I think a lot of women 
feel that way in terms of 
you’re not more sexy 
or more manly 
because you’re able to 
shoot something. 
There is much more 
honor and courage 
to saving a life 
than to taking one, 
that’s the bottom line. 
And when you’re 
taking a life 
for the fun of it, 
there’s no honor in that 
and there’s no courage 
whatsoever. 
We are,  and we do 
what we’re taught. 
And we are not, 
and we do not do 
what we are not taught. 
And that’s the reason 
why I’m a teacher. 
And that’s the reason 
why everybody 
has got to be a teacher. 
Now I have a great hope 
that kids are going 
to begin to teach kids, 
and I’ve seen that 
happening a lot. 
I see that with my kids, 
they teach their parents, 
they teach other kids. 
And I tell you what, 
they’re a lot more honest 
than when I went to school. 
Seventh graders 
know more than 
some people in their 60’s 
about what’s wrong 
with the world 
and what we need to do, 
and things 
that we need to make 
in the way of changes 
in our life, 
whether it’s our diet 
or how we treat our own 
suburban back lawn – 
chemical lawn treatment 
versus backyard habitat.
They’re so much more 
aware than people who 
are 30, 40, 50 years older. 
And if they’re starting 
with that awareness 
at such a young age, 
my hope is that 
we can build on that and 
end up with something 
very positive 
in the next generation. 
The children of 
Rosewood, Oregon (USA) 
were brought to 
Washington. DC (USA). 
A whole class, 
by their teacher, and that 
teacher brought these kids 
to go into the offices 
of the Congressman 
not just from Oregon, 
but all over. 
And that was 
the main reason; 
one of the biggest bills 
ever passed for animals 
was passed because 
about two dozen kids 
from one little school 
in Oregon 
went to Washington DC 
and made such a fuss.
A lot of families have 
dogs and cats and 
those are animals also. 
And if they can see 
their own pets at home, 
the way 
as they see the wildlife 
that’s out in nature, 
the same way, and 
have the same respect, 
I think they could 
be able to get it. 
They have every right 
to be here 
as much as we do. 
Nature is just such a prize 
that was given to us, 
and I think we really 
take it for granted. 
Next time you’ve got 
your cat or your dog 
on your lap, and you’re 
sitting there petting them, 
think about them, and 
what you feel about them. 
And then think about her. 
What really is 
the difference? 
I don’t want you to do 
something cowardly, 
and I think 
hunting is a cowardly act. 
I want you to do 
something heroic. 
I want you to do 
something worthwhile. 
I don’t want you 
to go out and 
deride your enjoyment 
from inflicting pain 
and misery and death on 
another living creature. 
Thanks for watching 
Undercover TV. 
If you would like 
more information 
about Undercover TV, 
please visit 
the In Defense of Animals 
website at 
IDAUSA.org
Thanks for watching. 
How can we help 
end hunting? 
We can talk to 
our friends and family 
and explain why it is 
wrong and inhumane 
to kill wild animals 
as they are gentle and kind 
in nature. 
Contacting our local 
government officials 
and expressing our desire 
to ban hunting 
is also important. 
We can inform them 
that hunting has no place 
in the 21st century 
as the animals 
suffer grievously and that 
this indefensible activity 
severely disrupts 
ecosystems.
Finally, 
we can set an example 
by following 
an animal-free diet, 
which is truly the mark 
of reverence for all life. 
Many thanks again
In Defense of Animals 
as well as Kenneth Williams 
and all others 
appearing in 
“What’s Wrong 
With Hunting”
for sincerely seeking an end 
to the senseless slaughter 
of our innocent 
animal co-inhabitants. 
For more details on 
In Defense of Animals, 
please visit 
www.IDAUSA.org 
A DVD of 
Undercover TV episodes 
is available 
at the same website
Thank you for joining us for 
the Stop Animal Cruelty 
program. 
Coming up next is 
Enlightening Entertainment, 
following 
Noteworthy News. 
May we all love and care 
for animals of all species.