Greetings, 
green-minded viewers, 
to this week’s episode of 
Planet Earth: 
Our Loving Home 
featuring 
an interview with 
Dr. Richard Oppenlander, 
a vegan, on how 
animal agriculture is 
destroying our planet.
Dr. Oppenlander is 
an American 
environmentalist, 
wellness advocate 
and dentist who 
over the last four decades 
has studied the effects 
of food choices 
on the environment 
and human health. 
He is also the president 
and founder of an organic 
vegan food production 
and education business 
as well as the co-founder 
of an animal rescue 
and sanctuary.
His research findings 
show that animal 
product production and 
consumption is severely 
harming our well-being 
and decimating our world 
by causing the substantial 
global loss of land, 
freshwater, clean air, 
food supply, biodiversity 
and energy resources at 
a frighteningly rapid pace.
As the author of 
“Comfortably Unaware: 
Global depletion and 
food responsibility... 
What you choose to eat
is killing our planet,” 
he has appeared 
on radio shows and 
written articles 
for newspapers and 
magazines to 
raise awareness of 
conscious eating.
We’re losing 
our global resources 
at an unprecedented rate. 
We are producing 
70-billion or more 
animals each year 
and it’s growing 
in exponential fashion. 
That number is a bit 
difficult to pin down, 
because on any given day, 
there will be, 
according to the 
Food and Agriculture 
Organization, 1.7-trillion 
chickens in the world and 
one- to two-trillion fish 
in the world that are 
on their way 
sooner or later 
to slaughter. 
So, it’s a massive number 
and all of our resources 
are being deployed 
for this purpose. 
So in the other direction, 
we’re using all these 
resources and all of
our energies to 
produce essentially food 
to create animals. 
It’s really not even food, 
it’s animals 
that we’re creating. 
And then we’re eating 
those and the end result 
is we’re eating something 
that’s unhealthy for us 
too.
So it’s sort of 
a two-bladed sword that 
we’re dealing with 
right now. 
If we just did away with 
all that unnecessary loss 
of resources, 
it would obviously 
be better for our health.
Meat production is 
inherently inefficient 
compared to 
growing plants for food.
Vast tracts of tropical 
rainforests are destroyed 
annually to create space 
for livestock grazing 
and cultivating crops 
for livestock feed. 
According to 
a United Nations 
Environment Programme 
report, 
animal agriculture-related 
activities take up 38% 
of our planet’s land.
Producing animal 
products also consumes 
huge volumes of water. 
For example a person 
uses up to 15,000 liters of 
water per day 
for a meat-based diet, 
which is 15-times 
as much water 
as a vegan would use. 
Water itself is the largest 
concern of any scientist 
that is studying where 
we’re going in our future. 
We are running out of land, 
of course, but we’re 
expected to deplete our 
water systems by 40%
in just the next 19 years. 
So if we didn’t use the 
water for all of the aspects 
of animal agriculture, 
we certainly could be 
applying it more frugally 
to our own use right now. 
They’re concerned about 
water scarcity, 
when in reality, it’s more 
about water management. 
Instead of technologies, 
we need to start 
looking at choices. 
Instead of choosing to eat 
animal products, which 
uses massive amounts of 
water, we could be
 using water just to 
sustain ourselves.
If you use your acre to 
grow grass-fed livestock, 
one acre isn’t 
normally enough. 
You would need 5, 10 
even up to 20 acres 
in most land in the world. 
And when you do that, 
after two and a half years, 
which is what
 it would take to grow 
one grass- fed cow, you 
would essentially end up 
with about 480 pounds 
of that type of 
animal product that 
people are calling food. 
In the course of 
that 2 ½ years, you would 
create or produce about 
three to four tons of 
methane and 
carbon dioxide. 
And you would also use 
minimally 20- to 30,000 
gallons of water. 
Minimally, that’s what 
they would drink. 
But in most cases, 
they would use about 
a million to two-million 
gallons of water
because of all the alfalfa 
or other aspects of water 
use that they would need 
to use to even irrigate 
the land to produce 
grasses for them to eat. 
Whereas if you use 
that same acre of land 
to produce something like 
a kale-and-quinoa 
combination, you would 
have the equivalent 
on average after 
2 ½ years of about 
15,000 pounds 
of food produced. 
If you slithered off 
1/8 of an acre, 
and you threw in 
some hydroponics, 
you could grow about 
30,000 pounds of tomatoes
during that 2 ½-year 
period of time. 
And you’d end up with 
food that’s infinitely 
healthier for you to eat 
and for our planet
to grow 
versus animal products.
The value of biodiversity 
is inestimable. 
Globally, a wide range of 
plant species keep nature 
in balance, feed 
the world’s population 
and improve 
the quality of life 
for humans and animals.
For example, over 70,000 
plant species are sources 
of medicine.
Plants also protect 
water resources, soil and 
support nutrient storage. 
Due to the production 
and consumption 
of animal foods and 
other hugely detrimental 
human activities, 
we have entered what is 
being called "the sixth 
great extinction event" 
with the current rate of 
biodiversity loss 
of plants and animals 
1,000 to 10,000 times 
higher than 
the natural background 
extinction rate.
Most people don’t equate 
their choice of foods 
with the loss of a species, 
like the Javan Tiger, 
Tasmanian Tiger, 
or Ridley Sea Turtle. 
But in fact, 
the largest component of 
loss of biodiversity is 
due to loss of habitat, 
according to numerous 
scientific organizations 
like the World 
Conservation Union. 
The documentation that 
they’ve seen will show 
very clearly that most of 
the land is being used by 
livestock, not agriculture. 
So 30,000 animal species 
are going extinct per year. 
In just one day, 
there will be another 
82 animal species 
gone forever. 
Most of those animal 
species are affected 
in one way or another 
by the food we’re eating, 
by either unsustainable 
fishing practices 
in our oceans, or 
the animal agriculture 
that we’re seeing on land.
By eating fish, we’re 
contributing to loss 
of biodiversity, 
we’re contributing to 
global warming, because 
it’s affecting the amount 
of oxygen that’s 
in our oceans right now. 
We’re also affecting 
our own health because 
fish in fact 
have cholesterol. 
They have many other 
issues that affect us. 
Obviously, if we’re 
moving entirely over 
to a plant-based diet, 
we’re going to be true 
stewards of our planet 
by not creating such
loss of habitat and 
destructions in our oceans. 
So species will be 
preserved. 
Dr. Oppenlander 
estimates that 
meat consumption leads 
to a minimum of 
US$150 billion 
in healthcare costs 
in the US annually. 
He now explains how he 
arrived at his conclusion.
What I usually do is 
I try to frame it 
slightly differently. 
I try to point out that we 
have a US$2.1- to 2.3-
trillion healthcare cost 
in America. 
Last year (2010) it was 
US$2.1- to 2.3-trillion. 
Now the minimal amount 
that you can quantify 
as applied to eating 
livestock is somewhere 
around US$150 billion. 
That’s minimal. 
That’s because if you add 
up the US$88- billion 
from food-borne illnesses 
from livestock or 
the US$180 billion 
from hypertension, 
the US$300 billion 
a year from heart disease 
or  cardiovascular 
concerns and then there’s 
diabetes for another 
US$100-120 billion.
And eating livestock or 
animals is minimally 
between 20-25-30% 
risk factor of all those. 
So it is at least 
US$150-billion dollars. 
I feel that this should be 
taken into account with 
our national healthcare 
plan and insurance. 
I feel like the title of 
my next book should be 
“Why Should We 
Be Paying for 
What Everybody else 
Decides to Eat?”
Livestock raising is
the single largest 
human induced source 
of  methane emissions, 
a highly potent, 
heat-retaining greenhouse 
gas, which has 72-times 
the warming potential 
of carbon dioxide 
over a 20-year period.
Scientists know that 
we are in an escalated 
global warming period 
with more greenhouse 
gases in our atmosphere 
than at any other time. 
So we have to do 
something to solve it. 
We can’t continue on 
with what we’re doing. 
The United Nations 2006 
report called Livestock’s 
Long Shadow stated
it was 20% of all of 
our greenhouse-gas 
emissions, which is 
more than all of our 
transportation sector, 
all our airplanes, cars, 
trucks and trains that we 
drive and fly every day. 
Some researchers that 
were also looking at it 
on the side very carefully 
since then 
have demonstrated that 
livestock is responsible 
for 51% of all 
greenhouse-gas emissions 
found in our atmosphere. 
It’s an issue of 
raising animals to eat. 
And that’s not going to 
change unless we get off 
of eating animals entirely.
Vegan organic farming 
improves the quality of 
our planet’s soil, water 
and air and thus 
enhances biodiversity. 
The practice can also 
tackle climate change by 
absorbing and storing 
carbon dioxide.
The Rodale Institute’s 
farming trial in the US 
verifies that 
organic agriculture, if 
practiced on our planet’s 
3.5 billion tillable acres, 
could sequester nearly 
40% of current 
CO2 emissions.
There are many food 
movements, as you know. 
There’s slow food, 
real food, organic food, 
and being a localvore. 
There are so many food 
movements right now. 
The issue is that 
they all are like a barge 
going down the river, and 
they’re carrying behind it 
this long line that is 
attached to animals, 
all of them are. 
So they’re not 
getting anywhere. 
In fact, they’re dragging 
more resources with it. 
So we need to clip 
the line, essentially, 
get the animals 
out of the equation. 
So real food, slow food, 
organic food and 
buying local food are all 
extremely healthy 
without the animals. 
So you can say that 
whether it’s organic 
or not organic, 
it doesn’t matter 
if it applies to animals, 
because it’s not going 
to be healthy 
for our environment, 
our planet or ourselves. 
Now, if you’re talking 
about organic or
non-organic or inorganic, 
vegetable sources and 
plant sources, sure.
Our respectful salute, 
Dr. Richard Oppenlander 
for your dedicated efforts 
to study the tremendously 
harmful impacts of 
the livestock industry, 
and convey the message 
about the virtues of the 
organic plant-based diet. 
May your benevolent 
work touch many more 
lives in the future.
For more information on 
Dr. Richard Oppenlander, 
please visit 
www.ComfortablyUnaware.com
His book 
“Comfortably Unaware” 
is available 
at the same website
Honored viewers, 
thank you for joining us 
on  Planet Earth: 
Our Loving Home. 
May we always 
experience abundant love 
and bliss from Heaven.